University · cohort
Cohort ·
Aggregate signal only — no individual list, no "at risk" ranking.
42
Students in cohort
62%
Have started evidence
40%
Have source-backed evidence
Clearest gap to close: Communication —
employers ask for it most, yet only 0% of this cohort can evidence it
(0% with a named source).
A short "attach your source" workshop would lift this fastest. See Skills in demand for what industry asks for most.
Computed live from cohort fixtures · refreshed 2026-08-10.
Where demand outruns evidence
Ranked by employer demand across published roles, against how much of this cohort can evidence it. Skills and fields come straight from Atlas — the same taxonomy candidates and employers use.
| Skill | Field | Employer demand | Cohort has it | With a source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication cross-field | Transversal |
0% |
0% | |
| Research & Inquiry cross-field | Transversal |
0% |
0% | |
| Written Communication & Reporting cross-field | Transversal |
0% |
0% | |
| Attention to Detail cross-field | Transversal |
0% |
0% | |
| Stakeholder Engagement cross-field | Transversal |
0% |
0% | |
| Software Dev | Engineering |
0% |
0% |
This is a curriculum signal, not a ranking of students. No individual is identified here.
What would move this cohort
Generated from the gap above — employer demand against what this cohort can evidence. This is information for your own planning: nothing here is filed, tracked, or reported back to Talentbank.
Communication
0% can evidence it · 0% with a source
Almost no one in the cohort can evidence it — the gap is exposure, not wording.
This is a cross-field skill, so it belongs in co-curricular design and assessment rubrics rather than one syllabus.
Planning options
Curriculum or co-curriculum reviewIndustry session on this skill
Research & Inquiry
0% can evidence it · 0% with a source
Almost no one in the cohort can evidence it — the gap is exposure, not wording.
This is a cross-field skill, so it belongs in co-curricular design and assessment rubrics rather than one syllabus.
Planning options
Curriculum or co-curriculum reviewIndustry session on this skill
Written Communication & Reporting
0% can evidence it · 0% with a source
Almost no one in the cohort can evidence it — the gap is exposure, not wording.
This is a cross-field skill, so it belongs in co-curricular design and assessment rubrics rather than one syllabus.
Planning options
Curriculum or co-curriculum reviewIndustry session on this skill
Export planning brief
Take it away and use it. Continuum creates no case, no owner, no status
and no outcome metric from this page — there is nothing here to track, by design.
Curriculum decisions stay with the university. Talentbank stewards the taxonomy; it does not set your programmes.